Saxon High Income
Over the past five years the Saxon High
Income fund has enjoyed a great deal of success,
with a sizeable average annual return of 14.5%.
However, this pales in comparison to the Scotia
Capital Income Trusts index (SCITI), which had
average annual returns of 26.3% over the same
period. Continuing a lagging trend the fund
struggled in 2005, yielding only 6.8% compared
to the index's 29.4% return. Much of the lag can
be attributed to conservative equity selection.
The fund is managed by Rick Howson and,
like all Saxon equity funds, the High Income fund
follows a value-oriented investment style. More
specifically, the fund takes a bottom-up approach
which favours trusts that have strong balance
sheets, little debt, and growing distributions.
Recognizing the risks inherent with income trusts,
Mr. Howson aims to maintain a comfortable
margin of safety in terms of retained income. He
prefers trusts for which the ratio of distributions
to distributable cash flow, the so-called payout
ratio, is on the low side. Of particular importance
to Mr. Howson is a trust's ratio of enterprise value
to earnings before interest, taxes, and depreciation
(EBITDA). Prospective purchases for the fund
must have ratios of no more than nine.
Mr. Howson also favours businesses which
are underpinned by long-term or non-depleting
assets. Examples include manufacturing facilities
and power plants which stand in contrast with the
depleting assets of, say, an oil well. Despite a
preference for non-depleting assets, the fund's
bottom-up analysis does occasionally lead it to
buy solid yet undervalued resource trusts. At the
end of 2005 the fund held 52.4% of it assets in the
consumer, industrial, and utilities sectors. In
contrast, the Scotia Capital Markets Income Units
index, which reflects the broader trust sector, had
over 61.4% of its assets in oil & gas, resources,
and real estate trusts (REITs).
Mr. Howson typically likes to hold at least
fourty different income trusts in the fund to
ensure a well-diversified portfolio. Once
purchased, a trust is held until it is considered to
be overvalued. According to Mr. Howson this
generally translates to a holding period of four to
five years. Adverse changes in a company's
fundamentals could, of course, prompt an early
sell decision. The fund's low 16% average
turnover does indeed reflect Howson's long-term
approach.
As previously mentioned, when compared to
other measures of income trust performance such
as the SCITI, the fund has lagged for the past two
years. The reason for this lacklustre performance
lies in the fund's deliberate underweighting of
energy trusts, whose valuations have benefited
greatly from high oil prices. Mr. Howson
continues to believe that the energy trust sector is
overvalued, and that such businesses are not
suitable for the fund.
Taken in aggregate, the fund's portfolio at
the end of 2005 was moderately priced. Although
it's earnings yield of 4.0%, which corresponds to
a price-to-earnings ratio of 25, was lower than
that of the S&P/TSX Composite index, it's low
price-to-book value ratio of 1.6 was attractive.
The fund's average dividend yield, which reflects
the high distributions paid by its constituent
income trusts, was also very attractive at 8.5%.
Reflecting Mr. Howson's preference, the average
payout ratio of the fund's holdings was roughly
90%. Four of the trusts held by the fund paid out
no dividend at the end of the year, suggesting that
they were forced to cut their distribution to
address other financial priorities. Trusts that have
stopped paying distributions are often called
'broken trusts' and can represent interesting
opportunities for value investors.
At the end of 2005 the fund's fourty-seven
income trusts and five stocks represented 97.2%
of the fund's assets. A further 1.2% was held in
corporate bonds and the remaining 1.6% was in
cash. The fund's top three holdings were the
Canadian Oil Sands Trust, the North West
Company Fund, and ARC Energy Trust. During
the fourth quarter the fund took advantage of
generally depressed prices, caused by uncertainty
surrounding the taxation of trusts, to add to
existing positions where bargains could be had. It
also sold the Advanced Fibre Technologies
Income Fund on declining fundamentals. Mr.
Howson also sold the Superior Plus Income Fund,
which had become too expensive.
Despite the federal government's pre-election
retreat from boosting taxes on income trusts,
which has generally been seen in a positive light,
Mr. Howson still expresses some concern about
this issue. He believes the story isn't necessarily
over and that the issue might be revisited at some
future, less politically-charged, time. Especially
if the number of trust conversions continues to
grow. But in the short term he feels it is more
likely that trust valuations will be driven by
energy prices and interest rates, rather than tax
issues.
Going forward, Mr. Howson expects that the
income trust sector should continue to provide
solid single digit returns. But a repeat of the
strong returns of the last five years shouldn't be
expected.
For a $5,000 minimum investment the Saxon
High Income fund can be purchased directly from
Saxon Mutual Funds in Ontario or through
brokers and dealers in other provinces.
With a low 1.34% MER, no load, and a solid
track record, the Saxon High Income fund is
suitable for more adventurous frugal investors
who seek greater income than that available from
traditional bonds and GICs. However, it is best to
think of the fund as a stock fund which should be
held as part of the equity portion of a wellbalanced
portfolio. The fund could also be seen
as a substitute for dividend funds or riskier highyield
bond funds.
FF: Q4 2005
| |
|