Portfolio positioning for '02
Consider small caps, overseas stocks, and hard assets
While last week's article reviewed and evaluated past recommendations, this week I'll provide some suggestions on portfolio positioning for the year that lies ahead. I'm not suggesting it's a good idea to make major shifts in portfolio exposure - that's flat out market timing. Rather, I'm suggesting making subtle shifts in some components of some portfolios, to improve diversification and hopefully boost returns.
Small cap stocks
I've just published a report for our firm's financial advisors and discount clients about the opportunities remaining in small cap stocks, particularly those in Canada. Some would attribute this recommendation to "performance-chasing". While it's true that small cap stocks have outperformed their larger counterparts over the past year, smaller companies remain fundamentally more attractive. In Canada, not only do smaller companies offer greater growth at a lower price, but they also carry less debt than larger companies. In fact, capital markets forced them into shape - call it tough love.
During the latter part of the 1990s, when the market's infatuation with large caps really blossomed, it became tougher for smaller companies to get access to capital. Venture capital investors catered to the specialty class of small private companies, while the public markets were in the throws of a love affair with large cap stocks that were tapping into high growth segments. However, the small and mid cap segments of the public markets became neglected. Whether it was a bond issuance or a public offering of shares, smaller companies were seen as risky compared to their larger counterparts (unless they were hot tech firms). Tight access to outside expansion capital forced many smaller companies to get lean and mean to facilitate more organic growth.
After completing a study on small caps and speaking with many managers, the top four of the eight Canadian small cap funds I recommend include Mawer New Canada, Standard Life Growth Equity, Beutel Goodman Small Cap, and Trimark Canadian Small Companies. Those interested in other small cap funds should look for funds with reasonable fees, low turnover (look in the prospectus), and between $20 and $400 million in net assets.
Throughout the 1990s, the United States lead both the economic boom and the stock market race - compared to nearly every other developed nation. As a result of the economic slowdown, the huge write-offs taken by U.S. firms, slowing earnings, and the strong recent returns, U.S. stock prices are at very high levels, when measured in traditional ways. Looking back over the past 75 years, the median price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) for the S&P 500 lies between 14 and 15. Lately, the ratio has been between 45 and 50. In other words, investors buying the S&P 500 stocks (i.e. through an index fund) are effectively paying $50 today for each dollar of last year's profits.
That figure of 50 times profits is a bit clouded by the fact that many large tech firms have been taking big hits to their earnings due to bad acquisitions, resulting in an overly dramatic fall in profits this year. (Be aware that taking a big hit all at once sets the stage for potentially misleading big earnings growth in many firms' next financial reports.) However, the index remains on the expensive side of history, and remain more expensive than many foreign developed regions, such as Europe, on that same basis.
This was the message delivered by John Arnold, global money manager for AGF Funds, in a recent meeting in Toronto. He says long-term profit growth in both the U.S. and Europe has been nearly identical but that the U.S. market has far outperformed it over the same period. The result, according to Arnold: The best relative value opportunity in over twenty years, as European stocks trade at much cheaper levels.
Some of my favourites among overseas stock funds include Mawer World Investment, AGF International Stock, Templeton International Stock, and Spectrum European Growth. The first three are broad based large cap overseas stock funds, while the Spectrum fund is a small cap European fund.
Hard assets, like natural resources, precious metals, and real estate, are an important long-term portfolio component. They provide some inflation protection, have risk-reduction characteristics, and offer some protection against inflation. Many managers maintain that gold continues to be undervalued and natural resource should generally pick up when the economy starts revving its engine.
While I wouldn't hold a larger than usual amount in such funds, some longer-term exposure remains a prudent idea. Some of the better hard asset funds include Dynamic Global Real Estate, Standard Life Natural Resources, Mackenzie Universal Canadian Resources, Royal Precious Metals, and Mackenzie Universal Precious Metals.
Cash and RRBs
As mentioned previously in this space, I expect interest rates to at least start heading north sometime over the next twelve months. Particularly if you buy into the fact that even a moderate recovery will get underway, interest rates are bound to rise. When rates rise, conventional bonds suffer price declines.
While I wouldn't advocate changing the amount of fixed income exposure, perhaps it's time to review the composition of this component. In a rising rate environment, cash tends to do well. In a mutual fund context, I'm talking about money market funds, which invest in treasury bills (i.e. government bonds with maturity of 90 days or less) and short-term corporate debt with similarly short terms.
Another way to insulate your portfolio from rising rates and inflation is to have some exposure to real return bonds (RRBs). RRBs are issued by the government of Canada but offer a maturity value and interest payment that move along with inflation. There is one fund investing exclusively in RRBs but with a MER of 1.7 per cent annually, I wouldn't recommend it.
This week's advice isn't to be interpreted as recommending big tactical shifts in individual strategy. Only an in-depth review of individual goals and constraints (perhaps with the help of a qualified advisor) can properly assess the necessity (or lack thereof) of such a shift. Rather, this week's advice is meant to give readers food for thought regarding potential subtle shifts in the context of current strategies, based on my expectations for the year ahead. For some it will fit; for others it won't.
Dan Hallett, CFA, CFP is the President of Dan Hallett & Associates Inc. in Windsor Ontario. DH&A is registered as Investment Counsel in Ontario and provides independent investment research to financial advisors. He can be reached at email@example.com
|Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...|