Stingy Investor Contact - Subscribe - Login
  Home | Articles | Screens | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
     
Tip Sheet
Tip Sheet Archive

Overview

High Dividend Yield
  High Yield DJIA30
  High Yield TSX60

Dividends at Risk
  Dividend Risk DJIA30
  Dividend Risk TSX60

Value Ratio Approach
  Value Ratio DJIA30
  Value Ratio TSX60

Graham's Approach
  Graham DJIA30
  Graham TSX60

Other Screens
  Low P/E DJIA
  Low P/E TSX60
  Low P/B DJIA
  Low P/B TSX60
  Low P/S DJIA



Stingy Investor Tip Sheet

Delving into Dividends

It might surprise you, but dividends are the primary source of long-term returns for stock investors. From 1900 to 2008 U.S. stocks provided average annual real returns of 6.0% including reinvested dividends. However, without the dividends, U.S. stocks only gained 1.7% a year over the same period. That's why I decided to take a close look at the history of U.S. dividends with the help of Robert Shiller's data.

First up, the following graph shows the S&P500's dividend yield from 1890 through to March 5, 2009. As you can see, yields have been quite low by historical standards for many years and are only starting to rebound. Just keep in mind that a slew of recent dividend cuts have yet to be fully incorporated into the data. Current yields are likely lower than they appear.


(click for larger version)


The next graph shows the dollar amount of dividends paid, on an annual basis, by the S&P500 in both nominal and real terms. That is, both without and with adjustment for inflation.


(click for larger version)


Because the last graph doesn't clearly show the early history of nominal dividends, the next one does. Just keep in mind that I've multiplied nominal dividends by 10 in this graph so that you can more easily compare them to real (inflation-adjusted) dividends.


(click for larger version)


The next three graphs show the S&P500's inflation-adjusted price along with inflation-adjusted dividends. As a result, you can see how dividends fared during previous periods of distress. I again multiplied the value of dividends (by 10 or 20) so that they can be more easily matched up with moves in the price index.


(click for larger version)



(click for larger version)



(click for larger version)


Dividends are great but they depend on earnings. The next graph shows both the S&P500's inflation-adjusted earnings and dividends. You can see that the S&P500's earnings have been comfortably higher than its dividends most of the time. But that's not the case today. (The last time earnings failed to cover dividends was in the 1930s.) It also appears that much of the dividend growth in recent years was ill-advised.


(click for larger version)


The next graph shows the history of the S&P500's dividend payout ratio. You'll remember that the payout ratio is calculated by dividing dividends by earnings and the result expressed as a percentage. The median payout ratio of 58% is also highlighted. The S&P500's current payout ratio is very high compared to its historical norms.


(click for larger version)


The next graph shows the S&P500's dividend yield. It is followed by two more graphs that show returns (nominal and real) for the 20 years after the S&P500 hit a particular dividend yield.


(click for larger version)



(click for larger version)



(click for larger version)


The next three graphs are just like the prior three with one difference. They use dividend yields based on average dividends over the prior 10 years. I call this yield10 and the idea is to use an average to better reflect the long-term dividend trend.


(click for larger version)



(click for larger version)



(click for larger version)



03/13/2009   11:30 PM EST   Permlink   save & shareDividends



 
About Us | Legal | Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...