Tip Sheet
Tip Sheet Archive
Overview
High Dividend Yield
High Yield DJIA30
High Yield TSX60
Dividends at Risk
Dividend Risk DJIA30
Dividend Risk TSX60
Value Ratio Approach
Value Ratio DJIA30
Value Ratio TSX60
Graham's Approach
Graham DJIA30
Graham TSX60
Other Screens
Low P/E DJIA
Low P/E TSX60
Low P/B DJIA
Low P/B TSX60
Low P/S DJIA

|
Stingy Investor Tip Sheet
|
|
Screening Trouble |
It's no secret that I like stock screens. I think most modern
investors do because they help uncover interesting stocks. But
screens aren't without their flaws. I was reminded of this when I
recently updated a slew of Graham-inspired stock screens in a special
report for Rothery Report subscribers.
One big problem with screens is that they can be an efficient way of
collecting errors. I highlighted one such problem in my special
report. My take on Graham's Simple Way screen for Canadian stocks
came up with Russel Metals (RUS). Based on the raw data from one
screener, Russel sported a dividend yield of 20.8%. Problem is,
Russel cut its dividend just a few days previously. Based on the new
dividend rate the stock was actually yielding 8.7%. This situation
highlights a big potential problem with screens. The data they're
based on may be out of date. In Russel's case, the old dividend rate
lingered. Regrettably, this sort of thing isn't rare.
Another example from the same Simple Way screen came in the form of
Teck Cominco (TCK.B). I used Globeinvestor and they pegged Teck's
debt-to-equity ratio at 0.20. But Teck recently reported its Q4
results and it's debt-to-equity ratio is now closer to 1.9 because it
pilled on a heap of debt when it bought Fording Canadian Coal Trust.
Based on the new debt ratio, Teck doesn't pass the Simple Way test.
This sort of problem drives me bonkers. But it is also one of the
reasons why I constantly warn my readers to double check and to read
all of the latest news on any stock before investing.
Canadian investors should also be aware of a slew of sneaky currency
issues. Dividend yield calculations come to mind again because
several Canadian stocks pay U.S. dividends. Fairfax Financial is a
good example. The firm currently pays an $8US per share dividend.
So, it is easy to calculate Fairfax's yield using its U.S. stock price
(FFH on the NYSE) but you have to do a currency conversion if you only
have its Canadian stock price (FFH on the TSX).
It doesn't stop there. Fairfax reports results in U.S. dollars. So,
if you're using a Canadian dollar stock price, you have to convert
earnings when calculating price-to-earnings ratios. (The same thing
goes for many other ratios.) But with earnings you run into a
subtlety. Do you take the firm's trailing 4-quarter earnings and
covert them at today's conversion rate or do you convert each
quarterly earnings result at the exchange rate for that quarter and
add them up? I've seen both approaches used by data vendors.
Programming bugs are also fairly common along with missing or
incomplete data. I like to run my version of Graham's screen for
defensive investors using the MSN.com screener. Regrettably, I've
likely been overly harsh on many firms by demanding that they have a
positive price-to-earnings ratio over the last five years. This
proviso in there to avoid companies that had an annual loss over the
period. However, the MSN screener appears to report 5-year P/E lows
for only a few firms. As a result, I now check each stock's earnings
history manually and thereby uncover more interesting stocks than I
would have otherwise.
This is all to say that screens can be very useful tools, but they're
only the first step. Make sure to dig into the details before
investing in any particular stock.
| 
| 05/02/2009 5:30 PM EST Permlink save & share | Screens | 
| 
|
| | |
|