Stingy Investor The Rothery Report
  Home | Articles | Screens | Tools | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
 
MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing
 Eye on PI

MoneySense Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 US Top 500 2016
 Retirement 100: 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 US Top 500 2015
 Retirement 100: 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 US Top 500 2014
 Retirement 100: 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 US Top 500 2013
 Retirement 100: 2012
 Buffett Buys
 FB IPO
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 US Top 500 2012
 Retirement 100: 2011
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 US Top 500 2011
 Retirement 100
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividends
 Dividend growers
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 US Top 500 2010
 Graham's prescription
 Income 100: 2009
 The case for optimism
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 U.S. Top 500 2009
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Income 2008
 Small stocks, big profits
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 US Top 500 2008
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 Income 100
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 US Top 500 2007
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Top Trusts 2006
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 US Top 1000 2006
 So easy, so profitable
 Top Trusts 2005
 Dogs of the Dow
 Top 200 2005
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

Globe & Mail Articles
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Long-Short
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks
Flip Books



Eight Thrifty Value Stocks for 2004

At the start of each year I search through the S&P500 in an effort to uncover a few thrifty value stocks. Aside from sticking to large companies, I also look for inexpensive yet profitable businesses with little debt. So far, the results have been quite gratifying.

Three ratios are very useful when searching for companies with little debt. The debt-to-equity ratio is perhaps the most well known and it is calculated by dividing a company's long-term debt by its shareholder equity. Although the amount of debt that a company should be comfortable with varies from industry to industry, debt-to-equity ratios of more than one are generally on the high side. I prefer to consider companies with lower ratios and look for a debt-to-equity ratio of not more than 0.5. Next up is the current ratio which is calculated by dividing a company's current assets by its current liabilities. Current assets are defined as assets, such as receivables and inventory, that can be turned into cash within the next year. Current liabilities are payments that the company must make within the next year. Naturally, an investor would like a company's current assets to be much more than its current liabilities and I prefer current assets to be at least twice as large as current liabilities. In other words, I stick to companies with current ratios of two or more. Finally, a company's earnings before interest and taxes should be large in comparison to its interest payments. The ratio of earnings before interest and taxes to interest payments is called interest coverage and it should be two or more.

These debt-related ratios are very useful for determining a firm's ability to shoulder debt but they are not perfect. Some long-term obligations may not be fully reflected on a company's balance sheet and are, sensibly enough, called off-balance sheet debt. Off-balance sheet debt is often ignored by investors, but it can be a source of considerable concern. For instance, Enron floundered under hard to find off-balance sheet debt. So, as with most screening techniques, further investigation is warranted before a final decision is made.

Continuing to look for safety, it is useful to consider companies that have some earnings and cash flow from operations over the last year. After all, it is unlikely for a business to go under when it is profitable and has cash coming in.

Finally, price is always an important factor for a value investor. As always, I'm not so much interested in a stock's price-per-share but in its price in relation to a fundamental factor such as earnings. In this case I've used sales as my fundamental yardstick and have screened for stocks that trade at a price-to-sales ratio of less than one. Table 1 shows a summary of my criteria for selecting thrifty value stocks.

Table 1: Thrifty Value Criteria
1. A member of the S&P500
2. Debt-to-Equity Ratio less than or equal to 0.5
3. Current Ratio of more than 2
4. Interest Coverage of more than 2
5. Some Cash Flow from Operations
6. Some Earnings
7. Price to Sales ratio of less than 1


Regrettably, the thrifty value stocks were not profitable in 2002* when the twelve stocks selected lost an average of 1.9%. However, this result was much better than the S&P500 which fell 22.1%. I also tracked the performance of twelve randomly selected stocks which luckily gained an average of 2.9% in 2002.

Thankfully the situation was much improved this year with the ten thrifty value stocks gaining an average of 38.8% from December 31 2002 to December 3 2003. Once more, the S&P500 index trailed with a gain of only 23.0%. In comparison, the ten randomly selected stocks did not fare as well with a gain of only 22.7%.

So far, the thrifty value stocks have outperformed both the index, and a similar number of randomly selected S&P500 stocks. This year, I've decided to drop the somewhat frivolous random selection of stocks and stick to tracking only the S&P500 and my value picks. I should also hasten to add that one should not expect this method to routinely outperform the index. I fully expect that it will encounter a down year, from time to time.

I used the MSN.com deluxe stock screener** to find this year's stocks and on December 3, 2002 it yielded the eight securities shown in Table 2. Half of the stocks found this year were also on last year's list with Big Lots (BLI), Leggett & Platt (LEG), W.W. Grainger (GWW), and Snap-on Inc. (SNA) being new additions. I've also included each stock's current dividend yield which should be of interest to investors looking for income. As with any stock screen it is worth taking some time to more fully investigate each stock before investing.

Table 2: Thrifty Selections for 2004
Company NameDebt to Equity Current RatioInterest CoveragePrice / Cash Flow P/EPrice / SalesShare PriceDividend Yield
Big Lots (BLI) 0.20 2.4 6.5 11.3 26.4 0.41 14.00 0.0%
Leggett & Platt (LEG) 0.50 2.7 7.7 10.9 20.5 0.92 20.50 2.7%
W.W. Grainger (GWW) 0.08 2.8 60.8 13.2 18.9 0.92 46.10 1.6%
V.F. Corp. (VFC) 0.49 2.2 10.6 9.4 12.3 0.86 41.55 2.5%
Liz Claiborne (LIZ) 0.29 2.6 14.9 10.5 14.6 0.92 35.25 0.6%
Snap-on Inc. (SNA) 0.33 2.0 6.7 11.8 19.0 0.82 30.34 3.3%
Nucor Corp. (NUE) 0.39 2.3 3.9 10.1 52.0 0.73 51.85 1.4%
Reebok Int. Ltd. (RBK) 0.35 3.0 8.9 13.2 18.0 0.71 39.33 0.7%
Source: www.msn.com, December 3 2003


It is interesting to note that the number of stocks found has been falling over the years with twelve in 2001, ten in 2002 and eight this year. To my mind this trend is somewhat worrisome and a sign that the U.S. large-cap market is becoming less of a bargain. So, perhaps more than ever, investors should remember Warren Buffett's admonition that "Unless you can watch your stock holding decline by 50% without becoming panic-stricken, you should not be in the stock market.".

* See the Canadian MoneySaver articles Stingy Selections & Dartboard Dynamos (January 2002) and Stingy Selections & Dartboard Dynamos 03 (January 2003)
** http://moneycentral.msn.com/articles/common/finderpro.asp

Date: Jan 2004

Additional Resources:


 
Discover top U.S. and Canadian value stocks in
The Rothery Report
About Legal Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...