Stingy Investor The Rothery Report
  Home | Articles | Screens | Tools | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing
 Eye on PI

MoneySense Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 US Top 500 2016
 Retirement 100: 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 US Top 500 2015
 Retirement 100: 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 US Top 500 2014
 Retirement 100: 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 US Top 500 2013
 Retirement 100: 2012
 Buffett Buys
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 US Top 500 2012
 Retirement 100: 2011
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 US Top 500 2011
 Retirement 100
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividend growers
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 US Top 500 2010
 Graham's prescription
 Income 100: 2009
 The case for optimism
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 U.S. Top 500 2009
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Income 2008
 Small stocks, big profits
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 US Top 500 2008
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 Income 100
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 US Top 500 2007
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Top Trusts 2006
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 US Top 1000 2006
 So easy, so profitable
 Top Trusts 2005
 Dogs of the Dow
 Top 200 2005
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

Globe & Mail Articles
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks
Flip Books

Timing Disaster

The September issue of the Canadian MoneySaver contained an avalanche of articles that encouraged investors to time the market. These interesting approaches sparked my memory. I recently had the pleasure of reading Charles Ellis' book Classics: An Investor's Anthology (1) which contains Robert Jeffrey's article The Folly of Stock Market Timing (2). The article included a startling figure showing the impact of market timing based on a simple strategy. I've updated his analysis in order to provide a cautionary tale to potential market timers.

Consider making a simple choice each month. You can either stay in the market as represented by the S&P500, or switch into 1-year treasury bills. The buy-and-hold investor will simply remain in the S&P500 for as long as possible. The market timer hopes to do better by switching out of stocks during market declines and back into stocks during bullish periods.

We will focus on two market timers. The first is a prescient investor who is able to flawlessly pick the asset (treasury bills or the S&P500) which performs the best every month. On the other hand, his poor cousin has a knack for invariably selecting the asset that falls the most every month. Each month our market timers look into their crystal ball and place their bets. Should they decide to switch from stocks to bills it will cost them 1% in brokerage fees, market impact costs and crystal ball maintenance.

Let's look at the historical record to see how our investors would have fared from January 1926 to April 2001 (3). During this period the inflation-adjusted performance of treasury bills, the S&P500 and our two market timers is shown in Figure 1. The top line represents the results achieved by the perfect market timer and the bottom line those experienced by the worst market timer. The annualized real return of treasury bills was 0.7% for the period and the S&P500 posted annual gains of 7.6%. Not surprisingly, the best market timer did quite well with a 24.8% annualized return. On the other hand, the poor market timer saw his wealth shrink at an annual rate of 22.3%.

It is useful to look at the potential upside and downside of market timing compared to simply buying and holding the S&P500. The S&P500 returned an average of 7.6% and the best timer did 17.2% better than that. Not bad! However, the penalty for poor timing is 29.9% worse than the simple buy-and-hold approach. In other words, the potential downside of market timing was 1.74 times or 73.8% larger than its potential upside. The downside of market timing becomes even larger when taxes are included.

Now a 1% trading cost may not be realistic for all investors. Large accounts and institutional investors should be able to do better. However, modest accounts may experience higher costs. Also, although market timing becomes less disadvantageous as commissions are reduced it never becomes advantageous. Even without commissions the marginal gain from the best timing strategy was less than the marginal loss from the worst timing strategy.

Let's look at the situation differently. The chance of the S&P500 outperforming treasury bills on a monthly basis from 1926 to 2001 was 58.7%. So, on average, switching from the S&P500 to treasury bills was a bad move 58.7% of the time. Include commissions and the probabilities get worse. With a 1% commission the chance of a bad switch was 62.3% and with a 2% commission the chance of a mistake was 74.4%. A 74.4% chance of being wrong is very hard to overcome on a consistent basis.

Does theory reflect reality? When it comes to mutual funds there is ample evidence of poor timing by U.S. investors. In the 1995 edition of The Journal of Portfolio Management, Stephen Nesbitt showed that fund investors lost about 1% a year by switching funds at the wrong time. More recently the June 2002 issue of Money magazine contained an article by Jason Zweig called What Fund Investors Really Need To Know. In Jason Zweig's study a fund's posted performance was compared to that earned by the fund's average investor over the last 4 years. The results were shocking. While the average U.S. mutual fund earned 5.7% annually from 1998 to 2001, the average fund investor earned just 1%. Poor timing reduced returns by 4.7%. It would appear that in practice, market timing is detrimental to one's wealth.

Although timing is bad for our portfolios, we must all be market timers to some extent. Most of us start life with little money and must collect it over time in anticipation of spending a bit before passing on. Given the odds against beneficial market timing I suggest practicing it only at the margins. For instance, after earning more money one can time a new purchase. If we expect to require funds then we can time our exit. Waiting a month or two shouldn't make a huge difference. However, changing an entire portfolio on a regular basis is likely to cause more grief than joy.


1 ISBN 1556230982
2 Harvard Business Review, July-August 1984
3 Source: TAM Asset Management

First published in October 2002.

Discover top U.S. and Canadian value stocks in
The Rothery Report
About Legal Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment advisor before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...