Stingy Investor The Rothery Report
  Home | Articles | Screens | Tools | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
 
MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing
 Eye on PI

MoneySense Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 US Top 500 2016
 Retirement 100: 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 US Top 500 2015
 Retirement 100: 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 US Top 500 2014
 Retirement 100: 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 US Top 500 2013
 Retirement 100: 2012
 Buffett Buys
 FB IPO
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 US Top 500 2012
 Retirement 100: 2011
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 US Top 500 2011
 Retirement 100
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividends
 Dividend growers
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 US Top 500 2010
 Graham's prescription
 Income 100: 2009
 The case for optimism
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 U.S. Top 500 2009
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Income 2008
 Small stocks, big profits
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 US Top 500 2008
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 Income 100
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 US Top 500 2007
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Top Trusts 2006
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 US Top 1000 2006
 So easy, so profitable
 Top Trusts 2005
 Dogs of the Dow
 Top 200 2005
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

Globe & Mail Articles
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Long-Short
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks
Flip Books



The Top 200 Canadian Stocks for 2007

Want to go hunting for buried treasure? Then join us as we once again dig up the shiniest prospects among Canada's largest 200 stocks in the third annual MoneySense Top 200.

We're pleased to say that the first two versions of the Top 200 have been a great success. Look, for instance, at our All-Around All-Stars from last year. These were the handful of stocks that scored well for both good value and good growth prospects. Since we selected them in November 2005, they have gone up in price by an average of 37.6%. Fold in the 57.6% return from the 2004 version of the All-Around All-Stars and our top picks are up 116.8% over the past two years. Yes, you heard that right. Someone who invested in our All-Around All-Stars from 2004 then rolled their gains into our top picks from 2005 would have more than doubled their money in two years - and their 116.8% gain doesn't even include the dividends they would have collected along the way.

As you might imagine, we are very happy with our results, but we want to stress that hunting for good stocks can be a hit or miss business. We've struck gold over the last two years, but we fully expect to stumble into an empty vault from time to time. As weathered veterans, we know that nobody can expect 37.6% returns as a matter of routine. We're keenly aware - and you should be too - that our top picks this year might flop. Remember the immortal words of the financial commentator Tim McMahon, who once pointed out: "Risk-taking is inherently failure-prone. Otherwise, it would be called sure-thing taking."

While nothing's a sure thing, we hope our track record will whet your appetite for this year's Top 200. We've worked hard to produce a ranking system that's easy to use, logical, and appealing to all types of investors. Even if the coming year doesn't yield as much booty as last year, we think the Top 200 will still provide you with a more objective, more insightful look at large Canadian stocks than you're likely to find from any other single source.

To arrive at the Top 200, we begin by identifying the largest 200 companies in Canada by net sales. Using data supplied from the Bloomberg database, we then evaluate each stock, first for its attractiveness as a value investment, then on its appeal as a growth investment. (What's the difference you ask? Value investors like beaten-down stocks that trade at low multiples of book value and pay juicy dividends. In contrast, growth investors like companies that are rapidly expanding their revenues and earnings.) Our value and growth screens employ some rather sophisticated measures of financial merit, but in the end we reduce everything about a stock to two simple letter grades - one grade for its value appeal, another grade for its growth potential.

The grades work just like they did back when you were in school. Highly polished top-of-the-class stocks earn an A. Solid but unspectacular stocks get by with a B or a C grade. Tarnished prospects languish with a D or even an F. The select group of stocks that manage to achieve either A or B on both the value and growth tests make our All-Around All-Stars list.

Only seven stocks fit into that exalted list this year. Four are making repeat appearances. E-L Financial and Kingsway Financial both got A's for value and growth last year and, after generating market-beating returns, earned double-A's once again this year. Russel Metals also earned double A's last year. It remains an A prospect for growth, but after shooting up 49.1% over the past year, not including dividends, its value grade has slumped to a B. Manitoba Telecom hasn't done much over the past year (other than provide a generous 6% dividend, that is), but still earns a B for value and an A for growth.

A couple of last year's All-Stars dropped off the list entirely for different reasons. The first was CHUM, which was bought out by Bell Globemedia at a hefty 59.1% premium to last year's price. The other was Enerflex, our only loser from last year's All-Stars list, which had the misfortune of converting into an income trust and running into the jaws of the taxman. Finally, we'd be remiss not to mention Aur Resources which was last year's most profitable All-Star with a 126.1% capital gain. Due to its massive run, Aur only managed a C grade for both value and growth this year.

As last year's results demonstrate, success isn't guaranteed for each and every stock on our list. If you're looking to make a quick buck from short-term trading, our system isn't for you. But if you're looking for a sane and objective take on any large Canadian stock, and if you're prepared to take the time to build a well-diversified portfolio, we think you'll find the Top 200 to be an invaluable way to generate promising investment ideas. Here's the lowdown on how we rated each stock:

The value test

Value investing is all about finding relative safety at a good price. For starters, we looked at each stock's price-to-book-value ratio (P/B). This measures a stock's price compared to how much it would be worth if you were to sell off all the company's assets, at their balance-sheet value, and pay off all the firm's debts. To get top value marks, a stock had to possess a low price-to-book-value ratio in comparison to other stocks and also to its peers within the same industry.

Companies rarely go bust while profits are rolling in, so we awarded higher scores to firms that had positive price-to-earnings ratios over the past year (this backward-looking figure is known as the trailing P/E ratio). We also rewarded a company if industry analysts expected it to have a positive P/E over the next year (this is known as the forward P/E ratio).

Because it can take a while for the market to notice value stocks, we want to be paid to wait. So we awarded extra marks to dividend-paying stocks. Furthermore, to ensure a company wouldn't be sunk by excessive debt, we penalized companies living on credit. Instead, we awarded the best grades to firms with low leverage ratios (the ratio of assets to stockholders' equity) compared to their peers. Finally, we combined all these factors into a single value grade. Only 18 out of 200 stocks earned an A.

Download the full table of Top Canadian Stocks for 2007 (a .xls file)

The growth test

The first mark of a good growth stock is, not surprisingly, growth. We started by awarding high marks to any stock that achieved robust earnings-per-share and revenue growth over the past five years. We also wanted to be sure that the market was taking note of this improving situation, so we handed out additional marks to stocks with strong price momentum, as measured by their ability to provide healthy total returns over the past year.

As great as growth is, we don't want to buy into fads, so we hedged our bets by checking out each stock's return on equity (ROE). This vital statistic measures how much a firm is earning compared to the amount that shareholders have invested. Only those stocks with strong returns on equity compared to industry norms earn our top marks.

Finally, since no one wants be the last buyer in a bubble, we examined each stock's price-to-sales ratio (P/S). This ratio measures the stock's price in comparison to the company's net sales. We figured that low to moderate P/S ratios indicate stocks that are reasonably priced, so we awarded them extra marks. In contrast, firms with high P/S ratios may be "concept" stocks that have generated a lot of hype, but little in the way of actual sales.

Putting all these growth and quality indicators together, we arrived at a final growth grade. Only 16 out of 200 stocks earned an A.

Download the full table of Top Canadian Stocks for 2007 (a .xls file)

A caveat

Before buying any stock on the basis of our grades, you should make sure the company's situation hasn't suddenly changed in some important way. Read the firm's latest press releases, regulatory filings, and scan newspaper stories to make sure you're up to speed on recent developments.

Remember the built-in limitations of screens. For instance, if a company ran into trouble a few weeks back - say the government suddenly decided to levy a new tax on its earnings - its stock can look like a bargain because the current share price will be cheap in comparison to the firm's past success. But the past results won't reflect the current reality.

The best way to use the Top 200 is as a starting point for your own investigations. You can focus in on the top-rated stocks or you can build your own list by looking up the growth and value characteristics that mean the most to you. If you're interested in stocks that sport high dividend yields and low price-to-earnings ratios, for instance, it's a simple matter to grab a pencil and underline a few choice stocks. Like any screening method, the purpose of the Top 200 is to help you dig through the stock market for a few possible treasures, which can then be examined in more detail.

Download the full table of Top Canadian Stocks for 2007 (a .xls file)

From the December/January 2007 issue

 
Discover top U.S. and Canadian value stocks in
The Rothery Report
About Legal Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...