Stingy Investor Contact - Subscribe - Login
  Home | Articles | Screens | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
 
The Top 200 Canadian Stocks for 2008

For most of us, picking stocks is as tricky as ordering a seven-course dinner at a swank new restaurant. We know that lots of items on the menu sound appetizing, but that's where our knowledge ends.

Rather than simply point and hope, smart diners look for a restaurant reviewer who can provide an expert opinion on the restaurant's offerings. To provide smart investors with a similar scouting report, we're pleased to present you with our candid take on all of Canada's largest stocks.

This is the fourth annual MoneySense Top 200 and we are pleased to say that connoisseurs have dined out very well on our past reviews. In each previous edition, we picked what we call All-Around All-Stars . stocks that score well on both our growth and value tests. Our All-Stars have consistently produced double-digit returns. The 2006 team achieved average returns of 16%, while the 2005 All-Stars gained 38%, and the 2004 squad soared an amazing 58%. An RRSP investor who put $10,000 into the 2004 picks and rolled his or her gains into the new All-Star team each subsequent year would now have $25,200. And those results don't include the generous dividends that we picked up along the way.

As you might imagine, we're delighted with our results. We want to stress, though, that picking stocks is an uncertain business. We don't expect to deliver double-digit returns all of the time. Indeed, we fully expect to lose money some years. Our 2006 All-Stars demonstrate how unpredictable the market can be. Our best pick, IPSCO, booked a 71% return before it was taken over by Swedish steel conglomerate SSAB. Our worst pick, Kingsway Financial, fell 23%, as the galloping loonie pummeled the value of the insurance company's U.S. operations. Smart investors should diversify their holdings and do their own research before arriving at a decision to buy.

To help you in your research, we've worked hard to produce a rating system that's easy to use, logical, and appealing to all types of investors. We think the Top 200 provides you with a more objective, more insightful look at large Canadian stocks than you're likely to find from any other single source. If you're looking for a sensible take on any large Canadian stock, you'll find the Top 200 to be an invaluable way to generate promising investment ideas.

To arrive at the Top 200, we begin by identifying the largest 200 companies in Canada by net sales. Using data supplied from Bloomberg, we evaluate each stock, first for its attractiveness as a value investment, then on its appeal as a growth investment. (Value investors like stocks that trade at low multiples of book value and pay juicy dividends. Growth investors like companies that are rapidly expanding their revenues and earnings.) Our value and growth screens employ sophisticated measures of financial merit, but in the end we reduce everything about a stock to two grades - one for value appeal, one for growth potential.

The grades work just like they did back when you were in school. Top-of-the-class stocks earn an A. Solid but uninspired students get by with a B or a C grade. Disappointments get sent home with a D or even an F.

Only a select group of stocks - those that manage to achieve at least one A and one B on both the value and the growth tests - qualify for our All-Around All-Stars. A mere seven stocks make the grade this year.

The value test

Value investors like solid stocks selling at low prices, so we begin by looking for stocks with low price-to-book value ratios (P/B). This number compares the market value of the company to how much money you could raise by selling off all the company's assets (at their balance sheet prices) and paying off all the firm's debts. You can think of a low price-to-book value ratio as assurance that you're not paying a lot more for a stock than its ingredients are probably worth. To get top value marks in our rating system, a stock has to possess a low price-to-book-value ratio compared to the market and also compared to its peers within the same industry.

Other factors matter too, of course. Good companies produce profits, so we award higher scores to firms that have positive price-to-earnings ratios over the past year (this backward-looking figure is known as the trailing P/E ratio). We also reward a company if industry analysts expect it to have a positive P/E over the next year (this number is known as the forward P/E ratio).

Because we like to have a little spending money in our wallets, we award extra marks to dividend-paying stocks. And to ensure a company won't be sunk by excessive debt, we penalize spendthrift companies living on credit. We award the best grades to firms with low leverage ratios (defined as the ratio of assets to stockholder's equity) compared to their peers. Finally, we combine all these factors into a single value grade. Only 18 out of 200 stocks got an A this year.

Download the full table of Top Canadian Stocks for 2008 (a .xls file)

The growth test

The first mark of a good growth stock is, not surprisingly, growth. We start by awarding high marks to any stock that has achieved robust earnings per-share and sales-per-share growth over the past five years. We also want to be sure that the market is taking note of this improving situation, so we hand out additional marks to stocks with strongly rising share prices. In particular, we favor stocks that have provided healthy total returns over the past year.

As great as growth is, we don't want to buy into fads, so we hedge our bets by checking out each stock's return on equity (ROE). This vital statistic measures how much a firm is earning compared to the amount that shareholders have invested. It is an important indicator of the quality of a business. Only those stocks with strong returns on equity compared to industry norms earn our top marks.

Finally, since no one wants to be the last buyer in a bubble, we examine each stock's price-to-sales ratio (P/S). This ratio measures the stock's price in comparison to the company's net sales. We figure that low to moderate price-to-sales ratios indicate stocks that are reasonably priced, so we award them extra marks. In contrast, firms with high price-to-sales ratios may be "concept" stocks that have generated a lot of hype and excitement, but little in the way of actual sales.

Putting all these growth and quality indicators together, we arrive at a final growth grade. Only 18 out of 200 stocks earn an A this year.

Download the full table of Top Canadian Stocks for 2008 (a .xls file)

The all-star team

As we mentioned above, a mere seven stocks earn at least one A and a B on both our value and growth tests. The only returning All-Star from last year's team is E-L Financial (TSX: ELF). The Toronto insurance company still gets an A for value, but its growth ranking slipped to a B after its price momentum flagged over the summer.

New to the All-Star list is Empire Company (TSX: EMP.A) of Stellarton, N.S. You probably know the food and real estate conglomerate for its Sobeys grocery stores. Another new All-Star, Sherritt International (TSX: S) of Toronto, is a diversified natural resource company that is best known for its operations in Cuba. Keep in mind that the U.S. frowns on firms doing business with Castro. Sherritt could feel the heat if Washington decides to get tough with the Caribbean nation. Such political questions are something that a stock screen like the Top 200 can't take into account.

Linamar (TSX: LNR), the auto-parts maker based in Guelph, Ont., is yet another new name on the All-Star list. It won its place on our list by growing its earnings and sales by double-digit amounts over the last five years. Growing even faster is Methanex (TSX: MX) of Vancouver. It has boosted its earnings-per-share by 57% annually over the last five years. Its primary business is making methanol, a form of alcohol used as an ingredient in plastics, plywood and paint. Who knew the stuff could be so profitable?

Our final two All-Around All-Stars are a study in contrasts. TransCanada (TSX: TRP) the giant pipeline company, is the classic widows-and-orphans stock. The Calgary firm may appeal to conservative investors.

On the other hand, Winpak (TSX: WPK), a Winnipeg food-packaging firm, is by far our smallest All-Star stock. It doesn't trade very frequently and is best suited for more adventurous investors. Before buying any stock, you should make sure that its situation hasn't changed in some important way. Read the firm's latest press releases and regulatory filings. Scan newspaper stories to make sure you've sussed out all the important developments and breaking news. Like a good restaurant reviewer, we've done our best to evaluate the offerings on the menu, but you should arrive at your own decision before loading up your plate.

Download the full table of Top Canadian Stocks for 2008 (a .xls file)

From the December/January 2008 issue

  MoneySense Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 US Top 500 2016
 Retirement 100: 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 US Top 500 2015
 Retirement 100: 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 US Top 500 2014
 Retirement 100: 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 US Top 500 2013
 Retirement 100: 2012
 Buffett Buys
 FB IPO
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 US Top 500 2012
 Retirement 100: 2011
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 US Top 500 2011
 Retirement 100
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividends
 Dividend growers
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 US Top 500 2010
 Graham's prescription
 Income 100: 2009
 The case for optimism
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 U.S. Top 500 2009
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Income 2008
 Small stocks, big profits
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 US Top 500 2008
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 Income 100
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 US Top 500 2007
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Top Trusts 2006
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 US Top 1000 2006
 So easy, so profitable
 Top Trusts 2005
 Dogs of the Dow
 Top 200 2005
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing

Globe & Mail Articles
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Long-Short
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks
Flip Books

Tools:
 Asset Mixer
 Periodic Table
 ETF Fee Calculator



 
About Us | Legal | Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...