Stingy Investor The Rothery Report
  Home | Articles | Screens | Tools | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
 
MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing
 Eye on PI

MoneySense Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 US Top 500 2016
 Retirement 100: 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 US Top 500 2015
 Retirement 100: 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 US Top 500 2014
 Retirement 100: 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 US Top 500 2013
 Retirement 100: 2012
 Buffett Buys
 FB IPO
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 US Top 500 2012
 Retirement 100: 2011
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 US Top 500 2011
 Retirement 100
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividends
 Dividend growers
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 US Top 500 2010
 Graham's prescription
 Income 100: 2009
 The case for optimism
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 U.S. Top 500 2009
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Income 2008
 Small stocks, big profits
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 US Top 500 2008
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 Income 100
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 US Top 500 2007
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Top Trusts 2006
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 US Top 1000 2006
 So easy, so profitable
 Top Trusts 2005
 Dogs of the Dow
 Top 200 2005
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

Globe & Mail Articles
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Long-Short
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks
Flip Books



The Top 200 Canadian Stocks for 2009

The market crash of the past few months reminds many people of the Great Depression. But we have a bit of different take on things. As Warren Buffett likes to say, you make money by being fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful. As agonizing as the past year has been, we think we are now in the middle of a tantalizing buying opportunity.

The market is oozing fear and Buffett himself recently loaded up on stocks for his personal portfolio. We think investors should take heed. History shows that buying in bear markets has been extremely profitable for patient investors. By many measures, stocks are now cheaper than they have been in a decade. While we don't want to minimize the risks involved - the stock market could take years to recover from its recent losses - we believe that long-term buy-and-hold investors should do well by investing at today's prices.

To help you uncover some of the most promising propositions, we took a hard look at Canada's largest companies and graded each of them for investment appeal. Our fifth annual MoneySense Top 200 is designed to be easy to use, logical, and appealing to all types of investors. In fact, we think the Top 200 provides you with a more objective look at large Canadian stocks than you're likely to find from any other single source.

Among other virtues, The Top 200 offers a very honest approach to picking stocks. Our results are based entirely upon the numbers - our feelings and opinions about a company don't matter a bit when it comes to assigning grades.

Each year we pick what we call All-Around All-Stars - stocks that score well on both our growth and value tests. We think these stocks make up an extremely promising roster of potential investments. But while we wish we could guarantee big gains every year, all we can vow is that we will be upfront about the results.

Like many other stock portfolios, our 2007 All-Stars suffered through a horrible year. They gave up 33% not including dividends. But despite the ugly results, we're happy to report that our long-term gains remain excellent. Our All-Stars have produced 14% average annual returns since we started in 2004. That's about 10 percentage points more than the annual return of the S&P/TSX Composite.

We remain happy with our long-term track record, but the loss we suffered this past year points out the risks involved with any stock investment. Our goal is to beat what the market produces by a couple of percentage points over an entire market cycle. So far, we're well ahead. But with reward comes the risk of a loss, and we want you to be aware of that.

To arrive at the Top 200, we begin by identifying the largest 200 companies in Canada by revenue. Using data supplied from Bloomberg, we evaluate each stock, first for its attractiveness as a value investment, then on its appeal as a growth investment. (Value investors like profitable stocks that trade at low multiples of book value and pay juicy dividends. Growth investors like companies with momentum and ballooning earnings.) Our value and growth screens employ sophisticated measures of financial virtue, but in the end we reduce everything about a stock to two grades - one for value appeal, one for growth potential.

The grades work just like they did back when you were in school. Top-of-the-class stocks earn an A. Solid students get by with a B or a C grade. Those in need of improvement go home with a D or even an F.

A select group of stocks - those that manage to achieve at least one A and one B on the value and the growth tests - make our All-Around All-Stars. Only nine stocks made it to the head of the class this year.

Before we talk about our new All-Stars, here's the low-down on how we rate all 200 stocks:

The value test:

Value investors like solid stocks selling at low prices, so we begin by looking for stocks with low price-to-book-value ratios (P/B). This number compares the market value of a company to how much cash you could raise by selling off the company's assets (at their balance-sheet prices) and paying off the firm's debts. You can think of a low P/B ratio as an assurance that you're not paying much more for a stock than its components are worth. To get top value marks in our system, a stock has to possess a low price-to-book-value ratio compared to the market and also compared to its peers within the same industry.

We also like to look at price-to-tangible-book-value ratios. Tangible book value is like regular book value, but it ignores any intangible assets (such as goodwill) a firm may have. So, it's an even sterner test of how much a company would be worth if it had to be closed down and sold off for scrap.

Other factors matter, too. Good companies produce profits so we award higher scores to firms that have positive price-to-earnings ratios over the past year (this backward-looking figure is known as the trailing P/E ratio). We also reward a company if industry analysts expect it to be profitable and have a positive P/E over the next year (this number is known as the forward P/E ratio).

Because we like to have a little spending money in our wallets, we award extra marks to dividend-paying stocks. (Cautious investors may want to pay particular attention to such stocks in this market. Dividend payers have historically held up very well during market downturns.)

To ensure a company won't be sunk by excessive debt, we penalize spendthrift companies living on credit. We award the best grades to firms with low leverage ratios (defined as the ratio of assets to stockholder's equity) compared to their peers.

Finally, we combine all these factors into a single value grade. Only 20 out of 200 stocks got an A this year.

The growth test:

The first mark of a good growth stock is, not surprisingly, growth. We start by awarding high marks to any stock that achieved robust earnings-per-share and sales-per-share growth over the past three years. We also track each firm's growth in total assets over the last year to get a sense of its recent momentum.

We want to be sure that the market is taking note of a growth company's improving situation, so we hand out additional marks to stocks that are strong performers relative to the overall market. In particular, we favor stocks that have provided good total returns, compared to the market, over the past year.

As great as growth is, we don't want to buy into fads, so we hedge our bets by checking out each stock's return on equity (ROE). This vital statistic measures how much a firm is earning compared to the amount that shareholders have invested. It is an important indicator of the quality of a business. Only those stocks with strong returns on equity compared to others in their industry earn our top marks.

Finally, since no one wants be the last buyer in a bubble, we examine each stock's price-to-sales ratio (P/S). This ratio measures the stock's price in comparison to the company's sales. We figure that low to moderate price-to-sales ratios indicate stocks that are reasonably priced, so we award them extra marks. In contrast, firms with high price-to-sales ratios may be riding a market fad and might have become detached from sensible expectations.

Putting all these growth and quality indicators together, we arrive at a final growth grade. Only 20 out of 200 stocks earn an A this year.

The All-Star team:

As we mentioned above, a mere nine stocks earn at least one A and a B on both our value and growth tests. The single stock to return from last year's All-Star list is Methanex (MX). Momentum slowed for the Vancouver-based methanol producer, but it became even more appealing as a value investment. It scores an A for value and a B for growth.

The two biggest stocks on our new All-Star team are Petro-Canada (PCA) and TD Bank (TD). Petro-Canada was clipped this fall when oil prices collapsed. But with the world running out of oil, the Calgary company offers not only outstanding value, but also a way to hedge your portfolio against future spikes in petroleum prices.

TD Bank, like most Canadian banks, managed to avoid the worst of the financial storm this fall. It has also managed to boost its earnings by an average of 16% a year over the past three years.

Canadian Tire's (CTC.A) stock is holding a 40%-off sale. Investors worry that we're heading into a recession but the Toronto firm's most recent quarterly results showed little indication that consumers were spent. Perhaps it's time to save like Scrooge by buying a few shares?

Transcontinental (TCL.A), a big North American printer and publisher of magazines and newspapers, isn't growing all that quickly. But, at 82% of book value and seven times earnings, the Montreal-based company offers outstanding value appeal.

Gold bugs might be disappointed that the yellow metal's price hasn't skyrocketed during the credit crunch. But we're happy to be able to pick up gold miner IAMGOLD (IMG) for a reasonable price.

Our last three All-Stars are smaller stocks. Algoma Central (ALC) runs cargo ships on the Great Lakes from its headquarters in St. Catharines. Velan (VLN), based in Montreal, produces industrial valves and is the only stock to pick up top marks for both value and growth this year. High Liner Foods (HLF), hailing from Lunenburg, NS, serves up seafood to millions and a good value to investors.

Before buying any stock, make sure that its situation hasn't changed in some important way. Read the firm's latest press releases and regulatory filings. Scan newspaper stories to make sure you've figured out all the important developments and breaking news. Remind yourself that while today is a stressful time to be an investor, stress usually pays.


Top 200 Full List
(Data as of Nov 4, 2008)






Investing in hard times
How to build a panic-proof portfolio

It's hard to protect your portfolio from downturns and to also benefit from bull markets. But there are a few practical things you can do to reduce your risk without having to flee to GICs.

Most important, you should diversify your holdings. Your first step in this direction should be to maintain a sensible split between stocks and bonds in your portfolio. If in doubt, put 50% of your money in stocks and 50% in bonds. This gives you a good balance between the risky but higher returns that you can get from stocks and the dependable but sometimes meager yields from bonds.

Remember, though, that everyone has a different ability to take on risk. If you're younger or more comfortable with risk, you might want to bump up your stock component. If you're older or averse to risk, you may choose to boost your bond holdings. But don't go to the extreme in either direction. To ensure that you're protected from both market crashes (the stock picker's worst enemy) and also inflation (the bond investor's worst nightmare), it's best to keep no more than 75% of your portfolio in stocks and no more than 75% in bonds.

When it comes to picking your specific investments, spread your bets around. Don't just stick to Canadian stocks. Look further afield and pick up U.S., European, and Asian issues as well. Similarly, don't fall in love with any single industry. Diversification doesn't mean holding 20 Internet stocks - or, for that matter, 20 oil companies. It means holding a variety of stocks that span many sectors, from pharmaceuticals to farming, from miners to media companies.

One common mistake is to bet a huge portion of your portfolio on just one stock. Sure, holding a single stock may make you fabulously rich. But you don't want to gamble your retirement on one big bet. (This is doubly true if you also happen to work for the company you've invested in. If you only own shares of your employer and its business declines, you can find yourself both out of work and out of money.) Even aggressive investors shouldn't invest more than 10% of their stock portfolio in any one company. Conservative investors should be even more cautious and put no more than 5% in any one stock. By restricting the size of your bets, you ensure that your losses will be contained if things don't work out quite as you hoped.

From the December/January 2009 issue



 
Discover top U.S. and Canadian value stocks in
The Rothery Report
About Legal Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...