Stingy Investor Contact - Subscribe - Login
  Home | Articles | Screens | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
 
MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing
 Eye on PI

MoneySense Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 US Top 500 2016
 Retirement 100: 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 US Top 500 2015
 Retirement 100: 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 US Top 500 2014
 Retirement 100: 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 US Top 500 2013
 Retirement 100: 2012
 Buffett Buys
 FB IPO
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 US Top 500 2012
 Retirement 100: 2011
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 US Top 500 2011
 Retirement 100
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividends
 Dividend growers
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 US Top 500 2010
 Graham's prescription
 Income 100: 2009
 The case for optimism
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 U.S. Top 500 2009
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Income 2008
 Small stocks, big profits
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 US Top 500 2008
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 Income 100
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 US Top 500 2007
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Top Trusts 2006
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 US Top 1000 2006
 So easy, so profitable
 Top Trusts 2005
 Dogs of the Dow
 Top 200 2005
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

Globe & Mail Articles
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Long-Short
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks
Flip Books

Tools:
 Asset Mixer
 Periodic Table
 ETF Fee Calculator



Unbundling Canadian ETFs
  Try our new Canadian ETF Fee Calculator
  Read the updated article: Unbundling Canadian ETFs 2008
  iUnits ETFs were recently rebranded as iShares ETFs.

Index investing has become very popular over the last few years despite mediocre market performance. The main advantages to an index-based approach are low fees, diversification, and simplicity. The index investorís goal is to attempt to achieve average, or market performance, for very little cost.

The low relative cost of indexing is very powerful and the general approach was mentioned approvingly by Warren Buffett in his 1993 annual letter to shareholders: ďBy periodically investing in an index fund, for example, the know-nothing investor can actually out-perform most investment professionals.Ē

These days index investors can buy a wide variety of low-cost index funds or exchange traded funds (ETFs). In fact, a fairly diversified equity portfolio could be constructed by buying only three country-based exchange-traded funds. Diversified Canadian exposure can be obtained with the TDís S&P/TSX Composite ETF (TSX:TTF) which tracks over two-hundred large Canadian companies. US equity exposure can be picked up by buying the Vangaurd VIPERs Total Stock Market ETF (AMEX:VTI) which tracks the five-thousand stocks in the Wilshire 5000 index. International exposure can be had by buying the RRSP-eligible iUnits EAFE ETF (TSX:XIN) which tracks the MSCI Europe Australasia Far East Index. An equity portfolio composed of these three exchange-traded funds is simplicity itself but is it inexpensive? The three exchange-traded funds charge less than 0.36% annually in management expense ratio (MER) fees. TTFís annual fee is 0.31%, VTI charges 0.15% per year, and XIN costs 0.35% per year. An equally weighted portfolio composed of these three exchange-traded funds would charge only 0.27% annually which is about a tenth the fees of a similar portfolio composed of actively managed mutual funds. It is this enormous level of comparative savings that provides the index investor with a significant competitive advantage.

While indexing can be a simple and inexpensive approach to building broadly-based equity ownership, not all index funds and exchange-traded funds are both low cost and broadly diversified. Some newer exchange-traded funds attempt to track small market segments represented by a particular sector or style. Fortunately the Canadian exchange-traded fund landscape has remained relatively simple and is dominated by the generally excellent iUnits family of exchange-traded funds offered by Barclays Global Investors Canada (www.iunits.com). iUnits ETFs are appropriate for many passive investors and represent a good investment option. However, an unusual class of long-term investor may be better off replicating the index by buying stocks directly.

Consider two options for the truly long-term index investor. The first option is to purchase an iUnit ETF and the second option is to buy the index's stocks directly. At first glance, the choice between buying a low-cost exchange-traded fund that holds many stocks or buying each of the stocks directly appears to be obvious. The exchange-traded fund is likely to be the better bargain. However, buying the stocks directly may be better for some investors because the Canadian stock market is very small and it is dominated by a few big names. As a result, one might reasonably approximate an index fund by holding only a few stocks.

Before looking at the details of each exchange-traded fund, I'll first set the time horizon for my hypothetical long-term index investor as being seven years. It turns out that seven years is about the length of time that the average equity mutual fund is held by Canadian investors. This surprisingly long holding period was determined by my fund-analyst colleague Dan Hallett who also writes for the Canadian MoneySaver.

With a seven-year time horizon in mind, we can now turn to an investigation of seven iUnits ETFs that are shown in Table 1. The most popular Canadian exchange-traded fund tracks the large-cap S&P/TSX 60 index (TSX:XIU) and has a rock-bottom annual fee (MER) of 0.17%. It is important to remember that exchange-traded funds trade like stocks and, under most circumstances, your broker will charge you a commission to buy and to sell them. Furthermore, an exchange-traded fund may pay dividends which are collected as the stocks in the underlying index pay dividends. This little wrinkle could cause a reinvestment problem in that the investor may be better off collecting dividends until a sizeable purchase can be made to avoid excessive brokerage commissions.

Table 1: Select Canadian Equity ETFs from iUnits
ETF MERDescription
iUnits S&P/TSX 60 (T:XIU) 0.17% S&P/TSX 60 Index
iUnits S&P/TSX MidCap (T:XMD) 0.55% S&P/TSX MidCap Index
iUnits Energy (T:XEG) 0.55% S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index
iUnits Financials (T:XFN) 0.55% S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index
iUnits Gold (T:XGD) 0.55% S&P/TSX Capped Gold Index
iUnits IT (T:XIT) 0.55% S&P/TSX Capped Info. Tech. Index
iUnits REIT (T:XRE) 0.55% S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index
Source: iunits.com (now ishares.ca)


Now, letís take a closer look at select iUnits ETFs with Table 2 showing a variety of interesting statistics for each fund. The first row indicates how much of the index is represented by its largest stock. For instance, the iUnits Info Tech index is dominated by Nortel Networks which makes up a breathtaking 24.85% of the index. Incidentally, the largest stock holding allowed by most of the iUnits capped ETFs is 25% with adjustments made quarterly. The next data row of Table 2 indicates how many stocks are needed to make up 25% of the index. For instance, both the Royal Bank of Canada and Scotiabank combined represent 29.22% of the iUnits Financials index. Similarly, Table 2 also shows how many stocks are needed to form 50%, 75% and 100% of the index. You will notice that the iUnits REIT index only contains seven REITs which means that it is a very concentrated fund. In fact most of the sector based exchange-traded funds shown in Table 2 are not particularly well diversified and an investor can replicate 50% of each index by buying less than six stocks. Even the large-cap S&P/TSX 60, which tracks a total of sixty stocks, invests over half of its assets in only eleven of the largest companies. It should now be evident that some indices are not well-diversified and sector specific indices tend to be very concentrated.

Table 2: Number of stocks required to replicate the index
XIU XMD XIT XGD XEG XFN XRE
Top Stock 6.69% 6.78% 24.85% 27.32% 21.26% 15.48% 23.95%
% of Index XIU XMD XIT XGD XEG XFN XRE
25% 5 5 2 2 2 2 2
50% 11 15 3 3 4 5 3
75% 24 32 5 8 7 8 5
100% 60 60 17 19 28 26 7
Based on April 22 2004 data from iunits.com


The high level of concentration in Canadian sector specific indices opens up the possibility of buying the component stocks directly. For instance, suppose an investor is interested in holding gold stocks as a buffer against bad times. He could buy the iUnits Gold ETF for 0.55% per year (plus a commission to buy and sell) or he could approximate the index by buying the top three stocks which make up 55.27% of the index at a cost of six commissions (three to buy and three to sell). For simplicity sake, Iíll assume that each commission costs $30, the holding period is seven years, the initial investment is $20,000, there is no inflation, and dividends are not reinvested. Furthermore, Iíll make the gross approximation that the MER cost of the iUnits Gold ETF over seven years is simply 0.55% times $20,000 times 7 for a total of $770. The commission arising from the direct purchase of three gold stocks is $180 compared to the exchange-traded fundís total fee of $830. A savings is possible for investors who donít mind giving up a little more diversification. If 55.27% of the index is too little diversification for an investor then they could buy 81.17% of the index by holding eight of the nineteen gold index stocks with a commission cost of only $480. As a result, a long-term index investor who is willing to approximate the index may be able to save money. Naturally such savings may, or many not, exist depending on the size of the investment, commission costs, the level of index concentration, and the time period in question. Furthermore, one can never predict with 100% certainty which option will be the lowest cost approach because the exchange-traded fundís fee is based on the size of the investment which is likely to vary over time. Nonetheless, buying directly may be an interesting option for more aggressive index investors.

Direct stock purchases also allow investors to be more aggressive on the tax front. For instance, at the end of the year, stocks that lost money could be sold to collect the loss for tax purposes. The money obtained from the sale could then be put into other stocks in the index or the exchange-traded fund itself. Similarly, holders of a concentrated exchange-traded fund that has lost money may consider selling it, collected the capital gains loss for tax purposes, and replacing it with individual stocks in the index instead. Naturally, before embarking on such investment programs, investors should talk to their investment and tax advisors.

Overall, passive investing with low-cost index funds or exchange-traded funds can be a good option. While broad market index funds tend to be lower cost and well diversified, sector specific index funds are often higher cost and much less diversified. As a result, investors should be mindful that they may not be getting the level of diversification that they expect. Furthermore, in some instances, direct stock purchase may be preferable for truly long-term index investors.

First published in the July 2004 Canadian MoneySaver.

Use our new Canadian ETF Fee Calculator to calculate when it is cheaper to buy stocks in an ETF or the ETF itself.

Notes: Read the updated article - Unbundling Canadian ETFs 2008
In the meantime, iUnits has changed its name to iShares. TD's S&P/TSX Composite ETF (TSX:TTF) no longer exists.

 
About Us | Legal | Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...