Stingy Investor Contact - Subscribe - Login
  Home | Articles | Screens | Links | SNW | Rothery Report
 
Retirement 100 (Fall 2010)

Do you dream of breaking free from cubicleville and visiting far off lands, exploring castles of yore, or sipping your way through wine country? Wouldn't it be grand if your stocks paid for the experience? To help launch your retirement world tour, we've ranked the largest dividend stocks in Canada based on their ability to put cash in your pocketbook.

Before we reveal this year's top picks for income investors, let's check out how last year's crop fared. Our stocks have paid big dividends since the spring of 2009, with our A-grade Retirement All-Stars shooting skyward with average gains of 58.3%. That includes non-reinvested dividends which we assumed were spent on pleasurable pursuits. (If they had been reinvested, the gains would have been even more breathtaking.) Meanwhile, the stocks that were rated either A or B gained an average of 46.9%. (Note that last year's picks did not appear in the magazine, but were posted online at StingyInvestor.com, where you can find them under the title Income 100: Summer 2009.)

Of course, the last year or so has been a pretty remarkable period for the markets which bounced back from their March 2009 lows. Still, the markets lagged our picks over the same timeframe. The iShares S&P/TSX Composite exchange-traded fund (ETF), which tracks Canadian stocks in general, gained 33.6%, while the iShares Canadian Dividend ETF, which tracks thirty of the largest dividend stocks in Canada, climbed 39.0%. That means our A-graded Retirement All-Star stocks beat those markets by 24.7 and 19.3 percentage points respectively.

The long-term gains, however, haven't been quite as spectacular. We started grading stocks under the Income 100 moniker in the summer of 2007. But they've now been rechristened as the Retirement 100 because high-yielding stocks are well-suited to retirement portfolios. Starting in 2007 turned out to be less than propitious due to the big crash of 2008-09. Indeed, the iShares S&P/TSX Composite ETF, has fallen 2.5% since we started, while the iShares Canadian Dividend ETF has eked out a 0.6% gain. Thankfully, our picks fared much better. If you bought equal amounts of each stock and moved into the new crop each year, your A-grade portfolio of Retirement All-Stars would be up 28.4%. Similarly, the A-and-B group gained 13.3% on average over the same period. That's not bad considering the period included one of the biggest bear markets of the last 100 years.

While we're pleased with these results, we aren't saying that you'll make a fortune by buying every A-rated stock. As the past few years have amply demonstrated, the stock market isn't nearly that predictable. Sometimes the entire market catches flu and profits vanish. Even in more buoyant times, individual stocks can disappoint. But the A-rated firms deserve your attention.

How we did it

We graded Canada's largest dividend stocks based on their ability to provide generous income to investors for a reasonable price. If you've read a report card, you'll be able to understand our grades. The best firms score an A, and good ones nab a B. Solid candidates slip through with a C while those with mediocre prospects get by with a D, or even an F.

The grades themselves are based entirely on the numbers. We didn't factor in any personal opinions about a firm. Instead, we scoured the Bloomberg database for detailed financial information starting with Canada's largest dividend paying stocks by market capitalization. We then trimmed the initial list to remove candidates that have been around for less than a year or lack the detailed financial data we need for numerical analysis. Finally, the marks are awarded based on three primary criteria.

Yield: The more money a firm puts in your pocket, the better. We gave top marks to stocks with high dividend yields. We also reward stocks that have a robust record of dividend growth because firms that grow their dividends are confident about their future prospects.

Reliability: While a good yield is great, we like it even more when we have some assurance that the dividends will continue to be paid. (Indeed, sometimes an extraordinarily high yield can be a warning sign, which is why we employ a bevy of additional tests.) As a result, we reward stocks that have earned more than they pay out in dividends. Stocks that pay dividends that aren't backed up by earnings tend to cut them.

We also give additional marks to firms with little debt because balance sheets stuffed to the brim with debt are riskier than those of more conservative businesses. We prefer to stay away from firms that have to borrow money just to keep the lights on because lenders tend to snap their wallets shut in bad times. Indeed, even strong companies had a hard time borrowing during the panic of late 2008. To measure each firm's reliance on debt we compare its debt-to-equity ratio against other companies in the same industry.

Value: On the value front we want to be able to buy lots of assets for a low price. As a result, better grades went to companies with moderate-to-low price-to-book-value (P/B) ratios. This number compares the market value of a company to how much cash you could raise by selling off the company's assets (at their balance-sheet prices) and paying off the firm's debts. Low P/B ratios provide some assurance that you're not paying much more for a stock than its parts are worth. We also prefer profitable stocks with lower price-to-earnings ratios.

Putting all of these factors together we arrived at the final grades for each of Canada's largest 100 dividend stocks. In total, only seven stocks made our All-Stars team by earning an A, but 15 managed a solid B this time around. We believe both the A and B groups are worth your consideration.

Retirement All-Stars
BCE Inc. (BCE)
Husky Energy (HSE)
Industrial Alliance Insurance (IAG)
Intact Financial (IFC)
Power Corporation of Canada (POW)
Telus (T.A)
Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD)
As of September 10, 2010


The number of A-grade stocks declined this year after the markets rebounded. Simply put, stocks are not as cheap as they once were and, as a result, you should expect decent but not extraordinary long-term returns from them going forward.

You should also keep in mind that the numbers only tell a fraction of the story. Savvy investors look out for businesses with unique, or intangible features, that might not be reflected in the hard numbers. Sometimes these features are beneficial, such as hidden assets or a new technological breakthrough, but other times they can be detrimental. Perhaps the firm has a looming legal liability or it is facing new competition. It is well worth your time to consider such possibilities.

It's best to use our grades as the foundation for your own research and then build from there. Importantly, before buying any stock, make sure that a firm's situation hasn't changed significantly. Read press releases, regulatory filings, and recent news stories to get up to speed on the latest developments. Like any screening strategy, the purpose of the Retirement 100 is to help you spot a few good ideas that you can then investigate in more detail.



Download the Retirement 100 table (a .xls file)




First published in the November 2010 edition of MoneySense magazine.

Past Retirement 100 / Income 100 / Top Trusts Articles

    Income 100: Summer 2009
    Income 100: Summer 2008
    Income 100: Summer 2007
    Top Trusts 2006
    Top Trusts 2005

Note: The original 2009-2010 return calculation for the A&B group has been corrected from 48.8% to 46.9%. As a result, the long-term return for the A&B group was corrected from 14.8% to 13.3%.

  MoneySense Articles
 Cdn Top 200 2016
 US Top 500 2016
 Retirement 100: 2015
 Cdn Top 200 2015
 US Top 500 2015
 Retirement 100: 2014
 Cdn Top 200 2014
 US Top 500 2014
 Retirement 100: 2013
 Cdn Top 200 2013
 US Top 500 2013
 Retirement 100: 2012
 Buffett Buys
 FB IPO
 Stocks that pay
 Value in the S&P500
 Cdn Top 200 2012
 US Top 500 2012
 Retirement 100: 2011
 Where to invest $100k
 Where to invest $10k
 Summer Simple Way
 A crystal ball for stocks?
 Cheap & safe
 Risky business
 Cdn Top 200 2011
 US Top 500 2011
 Retirement 100
 Dividend investing
 Value investing
 Momentum investing
 Low P/E P/B
 Dividends
 Dividend growers
 Cdn Top 200 2010
 US Top 500 2010
 Graham's prescription
 Income 100: 2009
 The case for optimism
 Cdn Top 200 2009
 U.S. Top 500 2009
 Wicked investments
 Simply spectacular
 Income 2008
 Small stocks, big profits
 Cdn Top 200 2008
 US Top 500 2008
 Value that sizzles
 So simple it works
 Income 100
 No assembly required
 Investing by the book
 Cdn Top 200 2007
 US Top 500 2007
 Invest like the masters
 A simple way to get rich
 Top Trusts 2006
 Stocks for cannibals
 Car bites dogs
 Cdn Top 200 2006
 US Top 1000 2006
 So easy, so profitable
 Top Trusts 2005
 Dogs of the Dow
 Top 200 2005
 Money for nothing
 Yield of dreams
 Return of the master

MoneySaver Articles
 2 Graham Stocks for 2017
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2016
 5 Graham Stocks for 2016
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2015
 3 Graham Stocks for 2015
 3 Stingy Stocks for 2014
 4 Graham Stocks for 2014
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2013
 6 Graham Stocks for 2013
 9 Stingy Stocks for 2012
 8 Graham Stocks for 2012
 Simple Way 2011
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2011
 7 Graham Stocks for 2011
 Simple Way 2010
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2010
 8 Graham Stocks for 2010
 Simple Way 2009
 Timing Temptation
 19 Stingy Stocks for 2009
 4 Graham Stocks for 2009
 Simple Way 2008
 Active at Passive Prices
 Unbundling ETFs 2008
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
 5 Graham Stocks for 2008
 Is your index too active?
 Graham's Simple Way
 Canadian Graham Stocks
 5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
 8 Graham Stocks for 2007
 Top SPPs
 The Simple Way
 A hole in your IPO?
 Monkey Business
 8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
 Graham Stock Gainers
 Blue-Chip Blues
 Are Dividends Safe?
 SPPs for 2005
 Graham's Simplest Way
 Selling Graham Stocks
 RRSP Money Market Funds
 Stingy Stocks for 2005
 High Performance Graham
 Intelligent Indexing
 Unbundling Canadian ETFs
 A history of yield
 A Dynamic Duo
 Canadian Graham Stock
 Dividends at Risk
 Thrifty Value Stocks
 Stocks in Short Supply
 The New Dividend
 Hunting Goodwill
 SPPs for 2003
 RRSP: don't panic
 Desirable Dividends
 Stingy Selections 2003
 10 Graham Picks
 Growth Eh?
 Timing Disaster
 Dangerous Diversification
 The Coffee Can Portfolio
 Down with the dogs
 Stingy Selections
 Frugal Funds
 Graham Revisited
 Just Spend It
 Ticker Temptation
 Stock Mortality
 Focus on Fees
 SPPs for the Long Term
 Seeking Solid Stocks
 Relative Strength
 The VR Approach
 The Irrational Investor
 Value Investing

Globe & Mail Articles
 Indexing advice
 Media-shy stocks
 Curse of size
 Market uncertainty
 Be even lazier
 Scary beats safe
 Small, illiquid, value
 Use the numbers
 What value is good value?
 Sculpt for value
 Value vs CAPE
 Graham Rules
 CAPE vs PeakE
 Top value ratio
 Low Beta
 Value and dividends
 Walter Schloss
 Try unloved AIG
 Why I'm a value investor
 New world of ETFs
 Low P/Es possible
 10 yielders
 Be happier
 Long-Short
 Dividend Downside
 Shiller's P/E
 Copycat investing
 Cashing in on class
 Index roulette
 Theory collides
 Diving too deep
 3 retirement villains
 Scourge of inflation
 Economic omens
 Analyst Expectations
 Value stock scarcity
 It's all in the index
 How to pick good funds
 Low Beta Wins
 Hunt for dividend stocks
 Think garage sale

Advisor's Edge Articles
 Passive Rebundling
 Doing the math

Norm Speaks
Flip Books

Tools:
 Asset Mixer
 Periodic Table
 ETF Fee Calculator



 
About Us | Legal | Contact Us
Disclaimers: Consult with a qualified investment adviser before trading. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, financial advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. More...