| |
 |
  |
|
| News Articles Stocks DRPs Brokers Links Free Newsletters |
| Rothery Report: Login Learn More Performance Sample Subscribe Contact Us |
5 Stingy Stocks for 2008
5 Graham Stocks for 2008
Is your index too active?
Graham's Simple Way
Canadian Graham Stocks
5 Stingy Stocks for 2007
8 Graham Stocks for 2007
Top SPPs
The Simple Way
A hole in your IPO?
Monkey Business
8 Stingy Stocks for 2006
Graham Stock Gainers
Blue-Chip Blues
Are Dividends Safe?
SPPs for 2005
Graham's Simplest Way
Selling Graham Stocks
RRSP Money Market Funds
Stingy Stocks for 2005
High Performance Graham
Intelligent Indexing
Unbundling Canadian ETFs
A history of yield
A Dynamic Duo
Canadian Graham Stock
Dividends at Risk
Thrifty Value Stocks
Stocks in Short Supply
The New Dividend
Hunting Goodwill
SPPs for 2003
RRSP: don't panic
Desirable Dividends
Stingy Selections 2003
10 Graham Picks
Growth Eh?
Timing Disaster
Dangerous Diversification
The Coffee Can Portfolio
Down with the dogs
Stingy Selections
Frugal Funds
Graham Revisited
Just Spend It
Ticker Temptation
Stock Mortality
Focus on Fees
SPPs for the Long Term
Seeking Solid Stocks
Relative Strength
The VR Approach
The Irrational Investor
Value Investing
Eye on PI
MoneySense Articles
Small stocks, big profits
Cdn Top 200 2008
US Top 500 2008
Value that sizzles
So simple it works
Income 100
No assembly required
Investing by the book
Cdn Top 200 2007
US Top 500 2007
Invest like the masters
A simple way to get rich
Top Trusts 2006
Stocks for cannibals
Car bites dogs
Cdn Top 200 2006
US Top 1000 2006
So easy, so profitable
Top Trusts 2005
Dogs of the Dow
Top 200 2005
Money for nothing
Yield of dreams
Return of the master
Norm Speaks
Over the past three years, I've used Benjamin Graham's time-tested strategy for defensive investors to uncover undervalued stocks. So far, the results have been extraordinary with significant gains each year.
Benjamin Graham first outlined his rules for defensive investors in The Intelligent Investor which has been in bookstores for more than fifty years. For those new to Graham, an updated edition of The Intelligent Investor (ISBN 0060555661) was released this summer with a forward by noted financial journalist Jason Zweig. Despite Zweig's sterling prose, the intelligent book buyer should consider picking up an inexpensive used copy.
Graham's rules for defensive investors are briefly summarized in Figure 1. Each year only a few stocks meet Graham's stringent rules for earnings growth at a low price and his method often rejects all stocks as unsuitable. Rejection has certainly been the rule in recent times and the situation is even worse this year.
| Figure 1: Benjamin Graham's Criteria for the Defensive Investor |
| P/E Ratio less than 15. P/Book Ratio less than 1.5. Book Value over 0. Current Ratio over 2. Earnings growth of 33% over 10 years. Uninterrupted dividends over 20 years. Some earnings in each of the past 10 years. Annual revenue of more than $100 Million (1950). |
| Source: The Intelligent Investor, 4th Revised Edition (pages 184-185). |
To implement Graham's rules I use the MSN.com stock screener which does a reasonably good job; but the screener doesn't have the wealth of historical data needed to fully implement Graham's rules. For instance, the MSN.com database only contains five years of data on each stock and, as a result, I trimmed down Graham's rules to those shown in Figure 2. Even with these relaxed rules, only nine stocks passed all tests in 2000, five in 2001, and ten in 2002. Regrettably, only two stocks passed the test this year. To put this in perspective, there are currently over 6,600 stocks in the MSN.com database.
| Figure 2: Screening criteria used to approximate Graham's rules |
| P/E Ratio less than 15. P/Book Ratio less than 1.5. Book Value more than 0.01. Current Ratio more than 2. Annual EPS Growth (5 Yr Avg) more than 2.9186%. 5 Year Dividend Growth more than 0%. 5 Year P/E Low more than 0.01. 1 Year Revenue more than $400 Million. |
The nine picks of 2000 continue to do well with seven stocks gaining ground and only two losing. A stock by stock breakdown is shown in Table 1 with the average gain for these stocks a very healthy 107.3%. Given that the S&P500 fell by 22.2% over the same period, the Graham stocks managed a remarkable outperformance of 129.5 percentage points over three years. I should hasten to add, that outperforming the index by such a large margin should in no way be considered typical, or even expected.
| Table 1: Performance of previous Graham Picks (October 3 2003) | |||
| Stock | Initial Price | Current Price | Gain |
| 2000 Graham Stocks (12/12/2000) | |||
| AAR Corp (AIR) | $11.94 | $9.70 | -15.8% |
| Haverty Furniture (HVT) | $10.06 | $20.76 | 112.4% |
| La-z-boy (LZB) | $15.88 | $23.20 | 52.7% |
| Rollins Truck (RLC) | Bought in 2001 | 82.0% | |
| Reliance Steel (RS) | $25.13 | $23.00 | -5.9% |
| Tredegar Corp (TG) | $15.56 | $15.70 | 3.5% |
| Thor Industries (THO) | $19.69 | $60.70 | *517.7% |
| Wabash National (WNC) | $7.81 | $16.75 | 116.1% |
| Watsco (WSO) | $11.35 | $19.65 | 102.6% |
| Average Gain | 107.3% | ||
| S&P500 (SPY) | -22.2% | ||
| 2001 Graham Stocks (10/29/2001) | |||
| Centex (CTX) | $39.45 | $83.71 | 112.8% |
| Domtar (DTC) | $8.19 | $11.38 | 43.0% |
| Haverty Furniture (HVT) | $12.80 | $20.76 | 65.3% |
| M.D.C. Holdings (MDC) | $27.35 | $59.11 | *164.1% |
| Pulte Homes (PHM) | $33.83 | $71.42 | 111.8% |
| Average Gain | 99.4% | ||
| S&P500 (SPY) | -1.4% | ||
| 2002 Graham Stocks (10/27/2002) | |||
| Centex (CTX) | $43.38 | $83.71 | 93.3% |
| Pulte Homes (PHM) | $46.17 | $71.42 | 55.0% |
| D.R. Horton (DHI) | $20.16 | $36.12 | 80.4% |
| Woodward Governor Company (WGOV) | $36.62 | $45.97 | 28.1% |
| M.D.C. Holdings (MDC) | $37.91 | $59.11 | *72.5% |
| Standard Pacific (SPF) | $25.10 | $40.39 | 62.2% |
| Seaboard (SEB) | $207.00 | $229.50 | 12.3% |
| Universal Forest Products (UFPI) | $18.34 | $26.93 | 47.3% |
| Haverty Furniture (HVT) | $11.75 | $20.76 | 78.7% |
| Watsco, Inc. (WSO) | $14.25 | $19.65 | 38.7% |
| Average Gain | 56.8% | ||
| S&P500 (SPY) | 16.3% | ||
| Source: quote.yahoo.com, *Adjusted for splits | |||
It turns out that the five picks of 2001 also boasted extraordinary performance with an average gain of 99.4%. Table 1 shows that the worst individual performer gained over 42% and the best 164%. The S&P500, on the other hand, fell 1.4% over the same period, which translates into superior outperformance of 100.8 percentage points for the 2001 Graham picks.
Last year's picks were also strong performers with an average gain of 55.8%. Table 1 shows that individual stocks gained between 12.3% and 93.3%. The S&P500 trailed the Graham stocks by 40.5 percentage points and gained only 16.3% over the same period.
Clearly Graham's defensive approach has done quite well but such results are unlikely to continue. It has been my experience that periods of significant outperformance are usually followed by periods of severe underperformance. Be warned that buying into a style that has recently done well is no guarantee that it will continue to do well.
This year's crop of Graham stocks is shown in Table 2. Since stocks tend to move very rapidly, I suggest checking the MSN.com screener to be sure that the stocks in Table 2 continue to fit Graham's criteria.
| Table 2: U.S. listed stocks that pass Graham's tests as of the close of 10/03/03 from www.msn.com | |||||||||
| Company | Price ($) | P/E | P/E 5Yr Low | P/Book | 5Yr EPS Growth (%) | Current Ratio | Debt To Equity | 1Yr Revenue (M) | 5Yr Dividend Growth (%) |
| Pulte Homes (PHM) | 71.42 | 8.8 | 3.4 | 1.48 | 280.9 | 2.7 | 0.76 | 7918 | 7.5 |
| Ameron Int. (AMN) | 33.85 | 9.5 | 4.9 | 1.14 | 49.3 | 2.5 | 0.43 | 576 | 1.1 |
It is important to note that stock screeners can be deceptive at times because they aren't always up to date. For example, if a company suffers from a sudden calamity then the stock may continue to be highlighted as good pick based on old data. One often finds stocks that look good in a stock screener but aren't good for a portfolio. I usually like to see some indication that a company's situation has remained largely unchanged before buying. For instance, looking at recent news stories on the company often helps.
This year the pickings are slim with only two Graham stocks. Naturally, investing in only two stocks is not recommended. Furthermore, deep value picks can be psychologically difficult for many investors. So, if you are considering stocks, remember Warren Buffett's admonition that "Unless you can watch your stock holding decline by 50% without becoming panic-stricken, you should not be in the stock market.".
Additional Resources:
The Intelligent Investor, Revised Edition with Jason Zweig (ISBN:0060555661)
The Intelligent Investor, 4th Edition (ISBN: 0060155477)
Get Rich Slowly (Time, July 08, 2003)
10 Graham Picks for 2003 (Canadian MoneySaver, Dec 2002)
Graham's Guidelines Revisited (Canadian MoneySaver, Dec 2001)
Seeking Solid Stocks (Canadian MoneySaver, Feb 2001)
Date: Nov 2003
|
|
| About Legal | Contact Us |
A Dan Hallett and Associates Inc. publication. Norm Rothery, Ph.D., CFA, is the Chief Investment Strategist at Dan Hallett and Associates Inc. (DH&A) and the founder of StingyInvestor.com. DH&A is registered as Investment Counsel in the province of Ontario. Norm, DH&A, or related-parties may have an interest in the securities mentioned. More...